At-risk Glasgow office block earmarked for serviced apartments
November 23 2020
A B-listed office block in Glasgow city centre which has remained vacant for a quarter of a century, falling onto the Buildings at Risk Register in the meantime, is to be put back to use as serviced apartments for short-term rental.
55 West Regent Street has lost much of its internal fabric over the years and will be extensively remodelled by Wellwood Leslie including the addition of a three-storey extension to the rear on West Regent Lane to accommodate a mix of 96 one-bedroom and studio apartments.
This will necessitate a significant reconfiguration of the roof which will follow the pitch of the current roof at fifth-floor level with the new addition rising behind in tiers through a newly created seventh and eighth floor.
In a statement of intent, the architects observed: "The internal layout of the facility has been designed wherever possible to align with the existing major structural walls and ensure the existing window configuration is not compromised in any way. A new additional enclosed fire exist stair is now incorporated within the building footprint to ensure compliance with current building regulations in terms of fire escape. the proposed roof extension is laid out in a manner to reflect the existing lower levels and elevational articulation.
"The proposed reconfigured roof will sit comfortably between the existing stone bay window vertical element to the east and the existing sandstone gable element to the west. At sixth floor level it will sit behind the line of the existing stone chimney. The proposed roof will be finished in matt dark grey cladding to match the existing slate roof colour with glazing arranged in reference to the classical façade."
A south-facing terrace will be created as part of these works for residents of the uppermost level.
|
8 Comments
https://www.architecture.com/image-library/RIBApix/image-information/poster/lion-chambers-170172-hope-street-glasgow/posterid/RIBA5928.html
I'm also interested to know who owners it. I had assumed it had many owners and that was a factor in the stalled schemes.
The building seems to sum up the issues with conservation of the b-list masterpieces
It is a sore loss, but I would rather see it make way for a modern building that works instead of the pro tempore we find ourselves in: the building moving closer to demo after another couple of decades of romantic notions destined to fail.
Whispering Andy is correct in my opinion. This building is beyond economic repair and it is long past time to let go. The floor plates in the tower are around a central lift and stair shaft, so that the space is relatively small and fragmented. The value of any resultant office or residential accomodation would be a small fraction of the costs to repair. If it is deemed of public value, as implied by A listing, the public in the name of the Council or a Preservation Trust has to pay. All that has been tried and has failed. It is just being left to rot, which is the worst of all outcomes.
Post your comments
Back to November 2020
Like us on Facebook
Become a fan and share