Courtyard housing to cater for Finnieston's build-to-rent market
September 25 2024
Updated plans for an 'eco-friendly' community in Finnieston have been submitted by Redevco and Cooper Cromar, as part of a general reconfiguration for the build-to-rent market.
Joining a wave of residential construction in the area the project will champion its green credentials by throwing out approved plans for a gas-fired combined heat and power plant, replacing it with a heat recovery system.
On the back of these changes the consultant team have looked again at the project, opting to reduce massing to Minerva Way. The northern block has also been straightened and pushed back from the site boundary to allow a children's play area to be created.
Adapting the classical order of St Vincent Crescent the new buildings will include deep reveals, a heavy base and a light pilaster crown.
Cooper Cromar wrote: "Similar to the restricted colour palette of the Finnieston locale, we are looking at a textured natural toned brickwork with architectural interest above windows and at double stacked floor edges. Architectural ironwork at balustrades will also be designed to add playful interest at openings.
"The softer internal courtyard harks back to Glasgow’s well-established architectural language of external matt masonry and inner light glazed brick courts. The Terracotta, whilst reflecting light and seasons, creates a dynamic green mantle adjacent to the leafy central core of the proposal."
The revised scheme now takes the form of an open-sided landscaped square framed by two apartment blocks, replacing an existing gym at 11 Minerva Way, defined by a no-build zone through the middle of the site mandated by railway tunnels.
Visualisations provided courtesy Float Digital.
|
6 Comments
Saying that a very large new build development is 'eco-friendly' in a country full of empty falling down buildings should never be allowed to wash.
Nicer than usual visuals though it has to be said.
And just to further ruin your weekend, a very large BTR vehicle being built by an offshore entity should also not ever be called 'eco-friendly' as people forget that community, social elements and long term live-ability are also a very important part of that name tag and given that everything is now called 'eco' should we not perhaps stop using that tag all the time on everything and focus on real community and sustainability?
Post your comments
Back to September 2024
Like us on Facebook
Become a fan and share